Talk:Great White Spot

Comments

Don't know why good material was edited out of this page, but I've redone it. Erimus 06:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Merge to Saturn?

Should we merge this article to Saturn. Great White Spot is not a permanent living storm. Spacecraft ususally cannot see it, and most of the iamges they taken from space Saturn just look like a squash. Saturn is actually a blue-silver disc, because Saturn spins too fast, this is why it looks yellow on spacecraft.--Freewayguy ^{Ask? +000s} 22:53, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

This is possible, but should be done accurately, since Saturn is a featured article. Ruslik (talk) 05:23, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

"rapidly expand in longitude"?

How to "encircle"? Or latitude??? It's puzzled me--U7vGun (talk) 18:42, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

References

Why are the references coming under "Notes"? 31.205.67.64 (talk) 20:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great White Spot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930024231/http://www.spacetelescope.org/bin/images.pl?searchtype=freesearch&string=Great+White+Spot to http://www.spacetelescope.org/bin/images.pl?searchtype=freesearch&string=Great+White+Spot

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)