Talk:Great spotted kiwi/GA1

(Redirected from Talk:Great Spotted Kiwi/GA1)
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Peanut4 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Lead
  • Wikilink pigs, dogs, ferrets and stoats.
  • "other factors" looks very vague. I'd expand on this.
  • Wikilink Nelson.
  • "A few small populations live on islands." You don't strictly mean populations. Perhaps "A small percentage live ..." or "A minority live ..."
Description
  • "The bodies are pear-shaped, with small heads and necks, along with long slender bills." There's a word missing from here.
  • "The eyes are small and do not see well." Why don't they see well? Is this why they're nocturnal?
  • "They can live up to fifteen years." Possibly live for up to?
Distribution
  • "Once, Greater Spotted Kiwis lived across New Zealand, but are now restricted to the South Island." What happened for them to be limited to the South Island.
  • "Great Spotted Kiwis reside in burrows that they make. These burrows are complex, sometimes like a maze, with more than one entrance and exit.[14] Up to fifty burrows can exist in one bird's territory." Three short sentences in succession. Possibly try to re-word.
  • Why isn't forest wikilinked?
Diet
  • A lot of short sentences. I would suggest having a look to see how best to re-write this and improve the sentence flow.
Reproduction
  • "To relieve the pain, females soak themselves in puddles." This sounds interesting. How do they do it? Do they purposefully lay the egg near water?
General
  • Numbers and their units should be split by a non-breaking space, e.g. 45 years.
  • Are there any more images.
    •   Not done I've looked around, and don't see any free images, but I'm bad with images, so I could be missing some. Shrewpelt (talk) 19:41, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

A bit to do, but I'll put it on hold. Peanut4 (talk) 23:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Great work and a nice read. If you were to take this article further, I would suggest getting a peer review before heading towards FAC. Although it's probably not essential, some more images would work well too. All the best with work on this article. Peanut4 (talk) 19:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply