| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Great Comet of 1882 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Great Comet of 1882 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
GA Re-Review and In-line citations edit
Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. Agne 01:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
GA review edit
This article is currently having its GA status questioned, see the discussion at Wikipedia:Good article review. T Rex | talk 19:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- As a result of the fixes made during the reassessment process at good article reassessment all objections to this articles status on the GA list have been withdrawn. Good job on fixing it up, and keep working on it. This could be a Featured Article some day! For the archived disussion, see Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 29. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 01:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
comet 1882 edit
Agreed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.167.20 (talk) 07:12, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Discovery edit
Reading the (Fayetteville, Georgia) Weekly Constitution, April 18, 1882, I found an article reprinted from the New York Sun, which suggests that this comet had been discovered in the preceding month. That is significantly earlier than this article suggests. On the same page, an article reprinted from the Philadelphia Times gives an interview with professor [Isaac?] Sharpless of Harvard. http://atlnewspapers.galileo.usg.edu/atlnewspapers-j2k/view?docId=bookreader/awc/awc1882/awc1882-0105.mets.xml#page/n0/mode/1up
In Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 43, p. 58-62, John Tebbutt gives astronomical observations from New South Wales, from June and July, 1882. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1882MNRAS..43...58T/0000058.000.html LineChaser (talk) 03:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)