Talk:Graveland

NSBM

This article sort of skirts around the fact that this band is made up of national socialists. It should be made perfectly clear that this partakes in extremist right-wing politics. Wikipedia shouldn't be a forum for right-wing groups to hide their f***edup beliefs. 71.35.114.99 04:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

How is it hiding it? It merely tells the truth, that he has made no direct statements regarding his music but that his essays often include those elements. You're overreacting. Also, he's starting to back off direct racism and is now becoming a more pure nationalist.Noktorn 03:32, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I think their neo-nazi sympathetic past should be included in this article, as it's only fair and truthful. No matter how ashamed or proud they might be of it, they were considered a neo-nazi band at one time due to Darken's pro-nazi comments in interviews. I don't consider them anything else than than a pagan black metal band these days, and I like a lot of their albums. --91.152.232.221 (talk) 20:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

What I find even more fucked up is the fact that this guy considered himself a "National Socialist" yet he is Polish. I guess when he signed himself up to be a neo-nazi, he forgot the part about the real nazi's killing 2.5 million(non-Jewish) ethnic Poles during WWII. You can't be a proud Pole and a nazi sympathizer at the same time, let alone being a nazi.12.74.24.110 (talk) 06:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Tell this to Hit-fukin-ler who was of jewish ancestry. Satanister666 (talk) 15:17, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Considering the article begins with "Graveland are a Polish National Socialist black metal ..." this would be factually inaccurate since this is no longer the case, it should be edited and elaborated on further in detail within the article itself. At present it is pagan metal, or pagan black metal depending where you draw the line with these blurred stylistic genres, and the article should begin in this manner. 2A02:8084:983C:A380:1192:CD8F:B2F5:AAF7 (talk) 20:28, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

The article does get into the NSBM label further on. I think this needs to be mentioned in the lead. Doesn't have to be the initial sentence.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Change in Ideology

I think new interviews should be compared with old to see if his ideology has changed, how much, and to what. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alphaknave (talk • contribs) 03:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

I think the revert by Blackmetalbaz was unjustified; thinking Christianity is a Jewish plan to enslave the white man is a typical conspiracy theory among NSBM people, and the way Rob Darken sees Heathendom is his own interpretation obviously mixed with his racist and anti-semitic views. That is a fact, not my point of view. --132.187.3.26 (talk) 15:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

That is totally incorrect... whilst I in fact agree with your POV, it is still POV. The edit was also entirely unnecessary as a) it is clear from the context that the view being represented is the POV of Darken, not fact, and b) barely written in English. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 07:34, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Merger problem

This is to address user H. 217.83 who is reverting merges to this article. Please stop.

The mergers have/are taking place due to a closed Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion discussion arrived at by consensus well over three months ago. Reverting a merger is not allowed by Wikipedia:Policy because:

• 1) in order to keep content from the redirected article(s) and add it to the target article, you must follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Merging#How to merge, (which is what I was doing);
• 2) following the policy/process will create proper links to the edit history, which is required by the Wikipedia license for legal reasons in order to preserve attribution of content to its authors;
• 3) reverting a merge in effect deletes the article(s) from which the merged content was drawn, thus unilaterally deleting articles (re: without consensus).

A reverted merger such as you made with this edit will break this process, as well as open Wikipedia to potential legal issues, and could be considered disruptive editing.

You have the right to further edit the article at anytime during the process, as per normal editing policies of Wikipedia; but the merged content must at a minimum be brought over here, per above explanation, and cannot be reverted. It can be edited, but not reverted.

Please do not revert the merged content again without a thorough discussion taking place here first. Any further reverts to the merged content will require a Edit warring notice be filed against your activities.

If you do not understand any of this, feel free to inquire further, and I will try to enlighten you. Thank you. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 03:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Graveland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120810033636/http://www.musicmight.com/artist/poland/wroc+3+aw/graveland to http://www.musicmight.com/artist/poland/wroc+3+aw/graveland

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)