Talk:Grand Ronde, Oregon

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Meditteranean Climate? Please! edit

Yes, it has wetter winters than summers, but 100" of rain a year NEVER qualifies as a Meditteranean Climate. Those climates are mostly dry (like Los Angeles, a classic example), not mostly wet. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.231.60.142 (talk) 05:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

   That's "a mediterranean climate", in any case.
--Jerzyt 08:55, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

(Grand vs. Grande) edit

   The immediately following section (which i've altered to the extent of indenting it a level deeper in this talk page's tree of discussion topics and super-topics) concerns, along with others i've started, a group of mutually related issues broader than the scope of the accompanying article page:
--Jerzyt 11:39, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


Disambiguation, historical expertise needed! edit

Grand Ronde (the CDP, this article) and the Grande Ronde River Valley are about as far apart as two places can be in Oregon. Natives of the Grande Ronde Valley, as I understand it, were of critical importance to travelers of the Oregon Trail, who traded cattle and horses with them and relied on their knowledge of local geography. Is there any connections between those people and the present inhabitants of Grand Ronde, Oregon? This issue needs to be dealt with, especially on this page, which is where Grand Ronde redirects to. -Pete 06:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Never fear, I just made two disambiguation pages and will put disambig notices at the top of the articles and remove the see alsos. Good old OGN says, long story short:
The French words "Grande Ronde" together mean generically a fine, large valley surrounded by hills, and two such places were named such by French Canadian trappers in Oregon. No connection other than the French kind. "Grand Ronde" without the "e" is a misspelling that has unfortunately stuck. Katr67 07:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
You - and the Magic Book, of course - have once again made my day. Nice job. A suggestion, though: I would rather see a single disambiguation page, that clarifies that one spelling applies to one region/valley, and the other to the other. That information is not apparent in the current structure…you'd have to be paying very close attention to pick up on it; the idea that the "Grand Ronde" page has a See Also pointing at "Grande Ronde" will likely be confusing to most readers. Not everyone has that eagle eye for minor differences in spelling! (Though I sure wish more did.) Anyway, many thanks! -Pete 07:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
P.s. Once again, I have massive regrets for not having a hi-res camera on hand for highway signs…the signs at the rest area on I-84 on the western edge of the valley have lots of good info, but my silly little brain can only remember so much.
You are right about the level of detail needed to see that pesky extra "e", of course, and just so you know, that see also section in Grande Ronde River was my early ham-handed attempt at a disambiguation so I figure it was my job to clean up. Thank you for paying attention! Anyway, I thought about putting the two disambig pages together, but wasn't sure which should redirect to the other...and absolutely there should be an explanation about the geography but I didn't want to promise one more thing I probably wouldn't deliver for a while. Feel free to tweak the mess as you see fit. I did check USGS and it seems Oregon really is the only place with things named Grand(e) Ronde so that makes it easier. Well, I won't be able to think clearly for much longer...goodnight. Katr67 08:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pending repatriation of talk contributions (if any) originally made at Talk:Grand Ronde, Oregon, but concerning only Grande Ronde, Oregon edit

   I was about to sort out whether the #Meditteranean Climate? Please! talk contributions are applicable to the NW or the NE cluster of topics, but i suspect that's the hardest question involved here. I may just copy that section to the other talk page, and append, to each of the two talk pages following that text that they will then have in common, a comment about my remaining confused abt where it really belongs!
--Jerzyt 11:39, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


Sharing a Dab page (Grande Rond(e), Oregon) edit

   The distinction between names with one silent terminal E, or two of them, is confusing enough for the human eye (perhaps especially one of a non-speaker of French) that i consider any choice other than a common Dab page for both of the spellings of the similar place names a betrayal of our users' interests. I'll discuss details of my (still tentative) design on the Dab page's talk page .
--Jerzyt 11:39, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grand Ronde, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply