Talk:Grammy Award for Best Hawaiian Music Album

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Jpcase in topic Table?
Good articleGrammy Award for Best Hawaiian Music Album has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 31, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 20, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Grammy Award category for Best Hawaiian Music Album was first presented in 2005 but eliminated six years later?

Question about who receives awards edit

The entry says that awards "were presented to the engineers, mixers and/or producers in addition to the performing artists" but the Grammy Awards site (www.grammy.com) lists as winners/awards recipients only the producers of winning compilations and only the performing artists on albums that are not compilations. Can someone explain this?

The NARAS (aka The Academy) rules specify that the producer(s) of a compilation receive the award -- not the artists. Can someone explain this?

Hawaii recording artists have confused things by going on stage when they were not actually winners -- the entry mentions Jeff Peterson doing this.

The entry mentions that Daniel Ho has five wins but didn't he also produce and engineer the solo album by Tia Carrere? If engineers, etc., also receive awards it would seem that he has more than five wins. Can someone explain this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.22.47.232 (talk) 11:54, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grammy Award for Best Hawaiian Music Album. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Table? edit

This article is very hard to follow. Tables have been attempted in the past, but have either been executed poorly or have been deleted. A table would not only make the article easier to read, but also make it more similar to other Grammy category articles. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:1D20:1660:5C0:9DD5:AC8B:B183 (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I agree with this wholeheartedly. The article in its current form simply isn't practical. Tables are standard for this type of article, and I would argue that the main purpose an article like this should serve is to act as a place where people can (very quickly) find the names of winning and nominated albums for any given year - it should only take readers a few seconds to find this information, but that's not possible without a table.
I've never actually edited this article myself, but I'm occasionally interested in finding information in it, and as a reader, I've never been satisfied with this article because of how long it takes me to find what I'm looking for. Presenting the information in a long prose section is fine - and even interesting - to have in addition to a table, but a table would serve a purpose for a lot of people and shouldn't be omitted. Does anyone object to including a table? --Jpcase (talk) 16:14, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Since no one's raised any objections, I've gone ahead and restored the table to the article. I can't imagine any reason why a table shouldn't be included. --Jpcase (talk) 21:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply