Talk:Graduate Management Admission Test/Archives/2017

GMAT Tutoring Section provides little information about the GMAT and is Mostly Advertisement

These statements look like thinly veiled promotion and have nothing to do with providing information about the GMAT. They should be deleted.

One GMAT tutoring company guarantees students specific GMAT scores for both in-person and online tutoring.

One independent GMAT tutor scored an 800 in 2001.

Should every company who guarantees some score increase be listed here? Should every person or tutor who scored an 800 be listed here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deleteasaur (talk • contribs) 21:59, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Deleted what appeared to be promotion/advertising in GMAT Tutoring and GMAT Preparation and made a correction. More corrections needed

The GMAT Preparation section seems unnecessary. In my opinion this page should focus on the test only. How you prepare is something completely different. For example, does a page about organic chemistry have links to organic chemistry tutors? I'm OK if others feel differently BUT if that's the case let's discuss in the talk page if 1. If it is appropriate to include test prep info 2. If it is appropriate, how it should be incorporated. Please use the talk page to discuss before adding back the test preparation section. I corrected the re-take time but there are still other factual issues on the page. Deleteasaur (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Once again deleted links to test preparation companies and tutors (Sean Berry, Test Masters, Study Copter...) from the preparation section

Please do not add links to test preparation companies or tutors to the GMAT page. This is advertising which is strictly forbidden on Wikipedia. I have mentioned this several times on the talk page and invited dialogue here so that we can come together to figure out:

1. If a preparation section is at all appropriate

2. If it is appropriate then how it should be presented.

So far there hasn't been any constructive dialogue and the tutors and prep companies just keep coming back. Please do not just add back the advertising that was there. It is most certainly against wikipedia policy. Thank you in advance. Deleteasaur (talk) 17:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Graduate Management Admission Test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120504061935/http://www.gmac.com/why-gmac/gmac-interactive-map/gmac-statistics-video.aspx to http://www.gmac.com/why-gmac/gmac-interactive-map/gmac-statistics-video.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120504061935/http://www.gmac.com/why-gmac/gmac-interactive-map/gmac-statistics-video.aspx to http://www.gmac.com/why-gmac/gmac-interactive-map/gmac-statistics-video.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)