Talk:Grace Portolesi

Marriage

She is married with a young daughter.

Would "She is married and has a young daughter" be less ambiguous? Andjam 00:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Give article talk pages a chance

Unverified information has been inserted (and rectified) in Family First related articles in the past (eg see Talk:Danny Nalliah), but c'mon guys - why use user talk pages rather than this nice shiny article talk page? Andjam 00:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Image

There's a chance I'll be meeting/interviewing Grace soon. Might be able to get a copyleft photo! michael ^talk 15:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

It'd be fantastic if you could. :) Ambi 01:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

References

This article clearly has taken large chunks out of other Advertiser and ABC Articles and I am sure that there are also some references missing for info taken out of the poll bludger site!

Uh, no. Please actually provide evidence if you're going to accuse me of plagiarism. Rebecca 00:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Unfair charge

I believe The statement regarding mps support of legalise prostitution is incorrect — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.125.213.56 (talk) 16:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Why do you believe that? (It is supported by quotes from Hansard - more information please.) Pdfpdf (talk) 16:22, 25 February 2014

There were no statements made by the MP in question on Hansard and is not mention any other MPs page

Thanks for the reply. It's past bed-time here - I'll check it out tomorrow. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Can an effort be made to provide references rather than slap cite needed throughout the article? And we don't need refs for things like seat margins when they're already in the internal link (ie: Electoral district of Hartley). Timeshift (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grace Portolesi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402000344/http://www.rotarnet.com.au/users/9/95209/Pre08/news07/1955web.pdf to http://www.rotarnet.com.au/users/9/95209/Pre08/news07/1955web.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)