Talk:Gračanica, Kosovo

Priština/Pristina

There are no need to delete all Priština links! That's why redicts are created. There must be NPOV in all of this. So, please, discuss it first, change later. :) Serbs call it Priština, and there can be left here. Anyway, it will all return to the main article.

Tadija (talk) 08:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

You are right. However, I edited the article in order to comply with the one-year-old discussion that's been going on in the Pristina talk page regarding how the English name should appear in the English Wikipedia, regardless of local references. For instance, we say Serbia rather than Srbija.--_{A B X} ^{T • ៛} 17:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Actually, there is a need for using "Pristina" instead of "Priština" (or "Prishtina/ë"), namely, for consistency with the article on that city and to follow the spirit behind the Manual of Style's general principle of internal consistency.

The current version of the naming conventions for geographic names states that "[w]ithin articles, places should generally be referred to by the same name as is used in their article title".

So, as long as the article on Kosovo's capital remains under the title "Pristina", in principle all other articles should use that same form. I have edited this article accordingly. - Best, Ev (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gračanica, Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091211190546/http://www.parlament.gov.rs/content/cir/akta/akta_detalji.asp?Id=466&t=Z to http://www.parlament.gov.rs/content/cir/akta/akta_detalji.asp?Id=466&t=Z

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Gračanica, Kosovo

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Gračanica, Kosovo's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "est2105osce":

• From Leposavić: "Zubin Potok". osce.org. OSCE. Retrieved 19 August 2017.
• From Zvečan: "Zubin Potok". osce.org. OSCE. Retrieved 19 August 2017.
• From Zubin Potok: "Zubin Potok". osce.org. OSCE. Retrieved 19 August 2017.
• From North Mitrovica: "Zubin Potok". osce.org. OSCE. Retrieved 19 August 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

It's a copy-paste error. Fixed!--AirWolf ^talk 18:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)