Talk:Govindudu Andarivadele

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Govindudu Andarivadele/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 12:06, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I should finish this today ☠ Jaguar ☠ 12:06, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

• "The film was officially launched in Hyderabad on 6 February 2014. Principal photography commenced from the same day" - this makes it sound like it was released in February, how about confirmed or announced?

Done. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

• "A large portion of the film was shot in Hyderabad, Rameswaram, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari, Pollachi and Karaikudi in India" - be careful of overlinking in the lead; I would recommend cutting down on a couple (less non-essential) locations

Almost 80% of the film is set in the rural areas and in such schedules i cant come to a conclusion which one to remove as we dont know where the film was shot for a longer period compared to others. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

No worries ☠ Jaguar ☠ 12:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

• "Balaraju, the head of his village, lives with his wife Baby along with his two sons Chandrasekhar Rao and Bangari and two daughters" - syntax could be imrpoved, how about Balaraju, the head of his village, lives with his wife Baby, his two sons; Chandrasekhar Rao and Bangari, and his two daughters?

Done. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

• "On the way, he witnesses a cockfight between Bangari and Baachi" - this makes it sound like Bangari and Baachi doing the cockfighting! How about something like organised by Bangari and Baachi?

Done. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

• "Sources reported that talks were also held with G. V. Prakash Kumar" - was he initially going to be the film's composer?

No. He was considered as the other option if Yuvan says no. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

• "and approached Ram Charan because of his relationship with him since the Charan's childhood disregard of his and his father's stardom" - the Charan's childhood disregard? Doesn't make sense here?

Removed "the". Trimmed the line till Charan's childhood. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

• "Adarsh Balakrishna, cast as a flashy MP's son living in the same village" - what does MP stand for? Member of Parliament?

Yes. Linked it with Indian Parliament as Member of Parliament (India) redirects to it. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

• Also, "MP" appears as "M.P." in the image caption "was seen as the son of a rich M. P. living in the village"

Fixed. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

• "A romantic song was shot on Charan and Kajal in early September 2014 at Jordan" - in Jordan

Fixed. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

• If you plan on FACing this, I would recommend expanding the Music section somewhat, but it's not required for this GAN

References

• No dead links

On hold

I love the sound of this film! Is there an English dub/subtitled? Anyway this is looking close to meeting the GA criteria, just a few minor points to address and then it should have no problem passing. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 17:22, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

At YouTube with English subtitles. If you intend to watch the film, a small advice. Watch its trailer here, and if you like it, then you can enjoy the film. You may find the leads' love story glorifying stalking in the beginning, so for clarity, have a look at this after watching the film. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! The trailer does look good so I think I'll watch that later today, it will give me something to do. Anyway thank you for addressing them so quickly, this article now meets the GA criteria. Please let me know if you have any more films that need reviewing soon ☠ Jaguar ☠ 12:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

@Jaguar: Thanks for reviewing the article, Jaguar! Let me know whether you liked the film as a whole or a part of it after watching it (the length may be a problem to you however). Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Govindudu Andarivadele. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/news-interviews/Govindudu-Andarivadeles-team-gets-busy-in-Hyderabad/articleshow/36491701.cms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)