This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Latest comment: 11 hours ago6 comments3 people in discussion
In my opinion, the AfD made a mistake. The existence of sources using this term does not mean that what is here is any good. Given the origin of this article, it is highly likely to be garbage misinformation and should be TNT'ed at minimum. I'll be watching and support any stubbification or a 2nd AfD. Crossroads-talk-22:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure, to be honest I forgot about this article. I see in the history that some cuts were made in August 2023 due to being from sources not about the alleged topic, so that's good. Crossroads-talk-23:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'd hear that but every source I've considered potentially promising based on its title has ended up being an argumentative or philosophical essay putting forth a first-party theory rather than a third-party review essay of those first-party theories. Peters & Pierre 1998 at least came close in summarizing academic dialogue on non-governmental networks' governing functions but even there I'm not sure what we'd write the article about right now. What three sources in your search do you consider most useful for describing how this subject coheres as an encyclopedic topic? czar14:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
In lieu of a permastub with unclear scope, I think we can cover this in a section of Governance#Types and can alway split out in summary style if there is indeed enough content that coheres into a topic that doesn't warrant coverage in the parent article. But as best as I can see right now, in sources it's used as a descriptive term ("governance without government described as) and not a standalone history (with specific history, development, academic discourse). czar13:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply