Talk:Got the Life
![]() | Got the Life has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Korn-gtl.jpg
editImage:Korn-gtl.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Got the Life/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TbhotchTalk C. 05:48, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Lead
- It was recorded in April of 1998 -> WP:MONTHS
- Done - Fixed
- Background and release
- revolved around the mixed blessings of fame. -> Sounds like a copy-paste.
- Done - quoted and published author
- Stephen Thomas Erlewine need a wikilink elsewhere in the article
- Done - linked
- The single also apprehends B-sides -> they could go on the infobox too.
- It is, but won't show up
- Music video
- the video album that -> maybe the video album where?
- Done - reworded
- Reception
- Allmusic -> Not need to be in italics.
- Done - removed italics
- Erlewine's comment is in two sections.
- Done - removed comment
- on MTV's Total Request Live -> In the previous section it says "Executives from TRL said", so this must be inverted.
- Done - changed both to MTV's Total Request Live
- and on January 12, 1999, the music video was officially declared the first video that retired from MTV -> Repeated too.
- Done - removed
- Also, January 12, 2009, had not been mentioned.
- Done - added to section
- On ref 22 TRL (or MTV Networks) publish the archive.
- Done
- Composition
- song on Follow the Leader -> overlinked
- Done - unlinked
- on Follow the Leader. Like Follow the Leader -> synonyms needed
- Done
- Chart performance
- Alfabethic order only.
- Done
- Australian ref is failing (but I checked it at Ultratop so there's no problem for now. If it is persistent change it.)
- I don't see how this fails (archived just in case)
- References 29 and 30 need accessdate and if its possible publisher
- Done
- References and notes
- Both are inverted (In this article the references should be the notes and vice versa).
- Done - Changed to "Literature" and "Cited"
- General
- Done' - repaired dab
I've checked it, on hold until July 18, 2010 (UTC). TbhotchTalk C. 05:48, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Everything is done. CrowzRSA 15:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Everything was done, well done, the article pass its nomination. TbhotchTalk C. 16:30, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Got the Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160301002442/http://music.cbc.ca/ to http://music.cbc.ca/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714123159/http://www.ms-management.com/resumes/makeup/MaitalSabban_Resume.pdf to http://www.ms-management.com/resumes/makeup/MaitalSabban_Resume.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121024195243/http://australian-charts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Korn to http://australian-charts.com/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Korn
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)