Talk:Gorilla (advertisement)

Latest comment: 1 month ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleGorilla (advertisement) was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 12, 2007Good article nomineeListed
March 18, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 13, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that in 2007, Phil Collins' 1981 hit "In the Air Tonight" reached Number 13 in the UK Singles Chart after appearing in Cadbury's Gorilla advertising campaign?
Current status: Delisted good article

Apropos of nothing edit

Apropos of nothing, of the many parodies watched while researching the article, this one is probably my favourite. Something about watching the gorilla trying to rock out to Bonnie Tyler just cracks me up. :) GeeJo (t)(c) • 20:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

To add to the list of favourites in the myriad lampoons, gangsta rap gets represented with 50 Cent - Al.locke (talk) 05:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Good article nomination on hold edit

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of December 11, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Overly long sentence at beginning of Sequence section. Are the redlinks needed for the various terms/people? Are they notable enough that they could have their own articles in their own right?
2. Factually accurate?: Generally well-cited throughout. Some other minor points on sourcing :
  1. Use of Citation Templates would be nice and would help to standardize the citations in the References section and add some sense of uniformity, though not required.
  2. Overall, make sure that citations appear after punctuation throughout the article.
  3. Citation needed at end of first paragraph of Background section.
3. Broad in coverage?: Passes here, many aspects well covered.
4. Neutral point of view?: Seems to be written in neutral wording throughout.
5. Article stability? No problems seen on talk page, edit history and edit summaries going back to article creation seem fine.
6. Images?: Three images with appropriate usage, fair-use rationales provided for each.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far.— Cirt (talk) 19:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • After these above issues have been addressed, please make a note of it, here below. At that point message my talk page and I will take another look. Cirt (talk) 19:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC).Reply
Looks like Alientraveller has gone through and addressed the issues raised here. Of the redlinks, I'd've kept Juan Cabral linked in the infobox (pretty big name in some circles of the advertising industry) and Cadbury Purple (aka Pantone 2685C), which I've been meaning to write an article on for a while, but I can always relink them if and when I find the time to make them blue. Other than those, no objections. With regards to cite templates, I personally find the things horrendous to use and, after having to write out references for papers and coursework without automated help for several years, I'm pretty consistent with guidelines anyway :) GeeJo (t)(c) • 20:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Pass edit

Good work, thank you for addressing my points from above. I feel this article is now of a high enough quality and satisfies the above criteria that I can pass it as a Good Article. I will go ahead and make the various updates. Nice job! Cirt (talk) 23:45, 13 December 2007 (UTC).Reply

WikiProjects edit

There are probably some relevant WikiProjects that you could add to the top of the talk page. As it stands now, there are none. Cirt (talk) 23:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC).Reply

Note for later edit

Forgot to update this when it first came out, but according to the annual Gunn report, Gorilla was the most awarded commercial of 2008 (backup ref: [1]) GeeJo (t)(c) • 19:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Also: Pepperami parody: [2] GeeJo (t)(c) • 19:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gorilla (advertisement). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:06, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

'Production' section needs cleaning edit

I'm new to posting editing stuff. However:

The gorilla suit was created by Stan Winston Studios in California and the 'Meerkat of Moorgate'- the City of London's most famous FX trader - Anthony Wood (known in the East End simply as 'Angry Ant') was the man inside it. Once his secret was out, Anthony immediately released his own cover of 'I can feel it coming in the air tonight', with a B side of Tina Turner's Private Dancer, that Rolling Stone magazine called the best thing to happen to music since Victoria Beckham stopped singing.

This is clearly bollocks, and needs to be sorted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.253.214.6 (talk) 11:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Peer review edit

Should we subject this article for peer review? Lbertolotti (talk) 16:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gorilla (advertisement). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gorilla (advertisement). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment edit

Gorilla (advertisement) edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

There is significant uncited material in this 2007 promotion, meaning it does not meet GA criterion 2b). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.