Talk:Gorilla/GA2

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 18:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

The prose needs tightening in a lot of areas, the article content is nowhere near complete, a lot of text is uncited, and the nominator The great Jay has never edited the page. This is a clear fail. Jay, I encourage you to work on the article before re-nominating. You can use Orangutan as a guide for writing ape articles User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 18:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )

3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed