Talk:Googleshare
Latest comment: 4 years ago by GalPedy in topic "though correlation does not imply causation" - why is that relevant?
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
need for references
editPlease see WP:V#SELF regarding the use of blogs as references. dr.ef.tymac 02:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
"though correlation does not imply causation" - why is that relevant?
editThe following sentence appear near the end of the article: "we can therefore assume "Ringo" and "Beatles" are somehow connected, though correlation does not imply causation." Why should it be mentioned here that correlation does not imply causation? The only claim made was that "Ringo" & "Beatles" are "somehow connected", i.e. correlated. As far as I can tell, there was no suggestion of causation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GalPedy (talk • contribs) 19:54, 17 August 2019 (UTC)