Talk:Google Shopping/Archives/2018
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Google Shopping. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Google Shopping. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130608154527/http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2003-01-13/will-froogle-be-a-google-for-shoppers to http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2003-01-13/will-froogle-be-a-google-for-shoppers
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Deceptive listings can't be reported. By design? Reporting 'em HERE works!
This form seems to be intended to allow it, but doesn't work. For the past week, the top entry at https://www.google.com/search?q=128gb+ssd&tbm=shop&sa=X has been $5 but isn't actually available/accurate. The form won't allow it to be submitted, insisting that a Google-provided link to retailer’s landing page has not been provided even if one has. I'm betting it's by design and won't be fixed. Has any consumer advocate written about it / made it notable? 50.201.195.170 (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm. Posting here seems to be a magic solution. It's been an hour or so, and the listing is gone.--50.201.195.170 (talk) 00:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
{{resolved}}- Just to clarify: the form is still broken. My particular reason for using the form no longer exists.--50.201.195.170 (talk) 00:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)