Talk:Good Muslim, Bad Muslim

Reads like an essay or attack

Hello TheBirdsShedTears, would you mind clarifying your comment or referring me to relevant policies and guidelines? TipsyElephant (talk) 15:34, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

I was about to ask the user on their talk page. I assume it's just based on the title and a misreading of the article. Good Muslim, Bad Muslim is just the name of the podcast and I'm guessing the joke is that one of them calls themselves a "bad Muslim" because they're not perfectionist in their practicing (like not doing the five prayers a day every day). But if you're not in the know I think it can easily sound like something racist (that's why it stood out to me when I was looking through the 0 days old AFC category). — Bilorv (talk) 19:27, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation comment

I think this is borderline on notability but I'm accepting it because I think there's not many more sources that exist and notability should be tested at AFD if someone disputes it. Commonly at AFC we say that a reviewer should accept if they think there's a 50% chance of it surviving AFD, which I do. Worth adding that this isn't a bad source to include and you could maybe squeeze some relevant details out of [1][2]. — Bilorv (talk) 19:29, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

@Bilorv: I recently got a newspapers.com account and found a few sources there as well. I'll make sure to add them in the next few days. TipsyElephant (talk) 12:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Oh nice, that would definitely be useful in bolstering the case for notability. — Bilorv (talk) 12:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

I added one of the sources, but the others upon further inspection weren't much more than a trivial mention. TipsyElephant (talk) 00:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)