Talk:Gone for Goode/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Link rot: no dead links found

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    A scene involving a funeral accidentally exhuming the wrong body while investigating the Church case mirrored a similar situation described in Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets from the Parrish case "a funeral accidentally exhuming the wrong body"? Do we mean an undertaker or a funeral director here?   Done
    I made a number of minor copy-edits for clarity.[1]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    The article is adequately referenced to reliable sources. I assume good faith for all off-line sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Thorough, but not over detailed.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Two images used, bot correctly tagged and captioned.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    If you can just fix the exhumation bit above, I will be happy to pass this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
    Good, all is in order, I am happy to list this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply