Talk:Gone Too Soon/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. The rules for GA reviews are stated at Good Article criteria. Feel free to respond to my comments under each one, and please sign each response, so that it's clear who said what.

When an issue is resolved, I'll mark it with  Done. If I think an issue remains unresolved after responses / changes by the editor(s), I'll mark it  Not done. Occasionally I decide one of my comments is off-target, and strike it out -- Aaroncrick (talk) 09:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I look forward to your comments. :) Pyrrhus16 10:10, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Coverage

• Y No obvious gaps. 21:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Prose

• Y Aaroncrick (talk) 10:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Verifiability

• Y Aaroncrick (talk) 10:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Links validity check

•  Not done per

• Two links not working. Aaroncrick (talk) 10:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

• Fixed dead links. Pyrrhus16 10:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Check for disambiguation and other dubious wikilinks

•  Not done per

• Prelude
• The Telegraph Aaroncrick (talk) 10:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

• Fixed both disambigs. Pyrrhus16 10:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Other comments

Absolutely superb. Nothing I can find that can be fixed. Aaroncrick (talk) 10:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)