Talk:Gold(III) bromide

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

gold bromide is dark crystaline solid it has nutral in nature

article contradicts itself and is confusing

edit

Gold(III) bromide is a dimer. The monomer hasn't been found. In complexes with ligands the dimer is broken up and species with a single gold atom are formed e.g. AuBr4. the article confuses complexes with the compound. --Axiosaurus (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I see the problem- the reference regarding AuBr3 monomer is a calculation of the stability of the monomeric species-the monomer itself has not been observed. I shall tweak the article to reflect this--Axiosaurus (talk) 09:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gold(III) bromide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply