Talk:Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes

Latest comment: 2 years ago by No such user in topic Requested move 27 August 2021

Possible vandalism edit

Someone wrote, beneath the website link, that the airline is "probably going bankrupt and out of business". It is completely nonsense. Besides, no sources were listed. That's why I deleted it.

189.15.192.25 (talk) 02:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

That was most likely for VARIG. That was going out of business and GOL bought it. Username006 (talk) 09:12, 27 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gol Transportes Aéreos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Airline Alliance edit

Even though it does not belong to an Airline Alliance, it has a relationship with Delta, in which their members can credit Frequent Flyer points respectively - More info available at http://www.delta.com/content/www/en_US/skymiles/earn-miles/earn-miles-with-partners/airlines.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomasdev (talkcontribs) 16:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Gol Transportes Aéreos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gol Transportes Aéreos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gol Transportes Aéreos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:40, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 August 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved, per MOS:CAPS a substantial majority of sources would be required to justify uppercasing. No such user (talk) 07:45, 8 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


– Should we get the capitalisation correct? It was mostly called as GOL and not Gol. For e.g. we call LATAM Brasil with the capitalisation and not Latam Brasil. Username006 (talk) 09:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. Havelock Jones (talk) 08:47, 20 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Weak Oppose Don't really see evidence that it should capitalized. The Portuguese version pt has it in lower case. If you can provide evidence, it would be welcome. Walrasiad (talk) 22:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


@Walrasiad: The website says it is GOL: [1] Also, the English wikipage itself has it all in the Capitalisation. Username006 (talk) 06:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Same thing goes for Varig. It should be VARIG and not Varig. And to be honest, I would like it for UNI air too. Username006 (talk) 10:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@: Just because it isn't an acronym doesn't mean it's incorrect. As far as I know, The 'LOT' in LOT Polish Airlines is also not an acronym. Username006 (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose. The "LOT" in the Polish airline is almost never rendered sentence case in sources, whereas the "Gol" here quite often does appear uncapitalised. Therefore the two articles are not comparable, and MOS:CAPS dictates that we should not use sentence case unless a substantital majority of sources do otherwise.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.