Talk:Gojong sillok
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge of Sunjong sillok with Gojong sillok
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge of Sunjong sillok with Gojong sillok
editGiven that these articles currently have nearly identical content, it seems like it may be more appropriate to merge them. signed, Rosguill talk 01:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support. Back when the redirects were created in 2008, there was a section entitled Gojong and Sujong sillok, at it might be worth merging the two pages into a joint page, given that their history is similar. Two emperors, but the annals have a similar history. Perhaps Phoenix7777, who created them as separate pages, might like to comment. Klbrain (talk) 17:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been notified to the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea#Proposed merge of Sunjong sillok with Gojong sillok.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 12:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Merge to the Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty page. These two stubs are only repeating what is said in the main article. Moreover, there is no separate article for any other sillok. Pldx1 (talk) 00:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Redirecting, rather than merging, as there is no unique content to merge. Klbrain (talk) 16:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)