Talk:Godzilla (1954 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 11:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• Move the short description to the top of the article (MOS:ORDER)
• Add alt text to every image in the article (MOS:ALT).
• "¥100 million (roughly $275,000)" – $275,000 now or in 1954?
• Actually, the template JPY should be used to calculate inflation.
• Add a hyphen between "longest running" (American English).
• The plot section is 693 words so it passes MOS:FILMPLOT.
• MOS:DUPLINK: radiation sickness, Daigo Fukuryū Maru, King Kong (1933 film), Eiji Tsuburaya, Akira Ifukube, Godzilla, King of the Monsters! , and Godzilla (2014 film).
• When referring to the film, please use "film" or its title instead of "movie".
• The word "stated" is used a lot and becomes repetitive. Replace some of its uses with "said".
• "Mori approved the project in April 1954" – the cited source does not mention this.
• "written three years prior" – prior to what? Please specify.
• #Music does not cite any references.
• "A week later, it was released nationwide on November 3, 1954." – is "a week later" necessary?
• Per WP:FILMBOXOFFICE, avoid terminology such as "in the West".
• Be consistent with Godzilla, King of the Monsters and Godzilla, King of the Monsters!.
• Resolve the "citation needed" issue in #Reception.
• Wikilink Owen Gleiberman, Peter Bradshaw, Desson Thomson, and Mick LaSalle.
• Is the accolades table necessary? The information can easily be converted into prose.
• Make sure all sources are properly cited with dates, authors, website names, and access dates.
• That's all I could find in my review. Great work on the article. Ping me when you reply.

@Some Dude From North Carolina: hey there! I added all the requirements above. I also added a Marketing section and added more content on the Music section, now titled "Music and Sound effects". I hope they meet GA standards. Armegon (talk) 00:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Progress

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed