Talk:Gochang, Hwasun and Ganghwa Dolmen Sites

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Dolmens?! How about 'Megalithic Burials'? edit

Yikes! Article should be renamed to conform with archaeological norms from 'Gochang, Hwasun and Ganghwa Dolmen Sites' to 'Gochang, Hwasun and Ganghwa Megalithic Burial Sites'. Although I rate this article as low priority but it is important to give the proper due and respect to Korean prehistory. Mumun at 64.229.149.239 22:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

weight over estimated edit

Inre: estimate of Dolmen weight. A cube 2.6x7.1x5.5 would be 101.5 cubic meters. If it was granite one of the harder and heavier stones; it would be about 3 tons per cubic meter. This would mean the estimate of about 300 tons would be correct. However the Dolmen is not a cube. If these are the maximum dimensions it would probably be about 200-225 tons. Zacherystaylor (talk) 06:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Since the largest dolmen couldn't weigh more than 225 tons judging by the dimensions I lowered the weight estimate.

Zacherystaylor (talk) 06:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gochang, Hwasun and Ganghwa Dolmen Sites. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply