Talk:Go at the 2008 World Mind Sports Games

Go Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Go, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the game of Go on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoWikipedia:WikiProject GoTemplate:WikiProject GoGo articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Multi-sport events Low‑importance

Go at the 2008 World Mind Sports Games is within the scope of WikiProject Multi-sport events. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Multi-sport eventsWikipedia:WikiProject Multi-sport eventsTemplate:WikiProject Multi-sport eventsMulti-sport events articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Redlinks on nations at World Games and Universiade.
Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (Overview at Category:Unassessed Multi-sport events articles)
Cleanup : clean-up listing for Multi-sport_events
Expand : 2009 Beach South American Games. All article related to preview Asian Games, such as 1962 Asian Games, 1958 Asian Games, etc. - Also Papua New Guinea at the 2015 Pacific Games and Fiji at the 2015 Pacific Games: athletes for most sports still to be added. -- Other articles that need expansion are the nations and events of the 2019 African Games. Help appreciated.
Other : Articles on multi-sport events, less the Olympic and Paralympic Games, need to be tagged on their talk pages with {{WikiProject Multi-sport events}}.

Several sources have been added

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

So far I have expanded the title section of this article, shown its notability, and added several references and sources for this article, so please do not unceremoniously redirect this article again.Cswquz (talk) 20:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

There's no author's personal viewpoint in the 'About the rules' section

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The whole section is composed by verifiable works. Could you study the materials cited in that section before add the tag?Cswquz (talk) 17:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

And its written like an essay not encyclopaedic in tone.PRehse (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

You are talking about the thing you know nothing. If you do not like its tone, why not improve it?Cswquz (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic