Talk:Gnateater

Birds Mid‑importance

Gnateater is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Ok, granted they live in the forest understorey and all, but could we have a brighter picture? Totnesmartin (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, no. Not until we have a neotropical birder come back and share his images with us. Getting good images of skulking understory species is hard work and people who manage it don't always want to share. I'm just grateful we have an image at all. Sabine's Sunbird talk 20:58, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh all right then. Totnesmartin (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gnateater. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Authority for Conopophagidae edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've changed the authority from Sclater & Salvin 1873 to Garrod 1877. As many sources claim Sclater & Salvin 1873 as the authority I need to explain why.

Bock 1994 gives the authority as Sclater & Salvin 1873 but does not cite a page number.^[1] A scan of Sclater & Salvin 1873 is available from BHL but I'm unable to find any mention of the genus Conopophaga - or any reference to a subfamily/family.^[2] In 1890 Sclater credits Garrod 1877 on page 329 of Vol 15 of the Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum.^[3]^[4]

Ames et al 1968 also credit Garrod and give details.^[5] But the 49th Supplement to the AOU list follows Bock and credits Sclater & Salvin 1873 - without specifying a page.^[6]

I assume that Bock made a mistake and other authors have copied him. Bock's book is known to be unreliable and to contain errors.^[7]

References

^ Bock, Walter J. (1994). History and Nomenclature of Avian Family-Group Names. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. Vol. Number 222. New York: American Museum of Natural History. pp. 148, 257. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help)
^ Sclater, P.L.; Salvin, Osbert (1873). Nomenclator avium neotropicalium : sive avium quae in regione neotropica hucusque repertae sunt nomina systematice disposita adjecta sua cuique speciei patria accedunt generum et specierum novarum diagnoses (in Latin). London: Sumptibus Auctorum.
^ Sclater, P.L. (1890). Catalogue of the Passeriformes or Perching Birds in the Collection of the British Museum. Tracheophonae. Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum. Vol. 15. London: Trustees of the British Museum. p. 329.
^ Garrod, Alfred Henry (1877). "Notes on the anatomy of passerine birds. Part II". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London: 447-452 [452].
^ Ames, P.; Heimerdinger, M.; Warter, S. (1968). "The anatomy and systematic position of the antpipits Conopophaga and Corythopis". Postilla (114).
^ Banks, R.C.; Chesser, R.T.; Cicero, C.; Dunn, J.L.; Kratter, A.W.; Lovette, I.J.; Rasmussen, P.C.; Remsen, J.V.; Rising, J.D.; Stotz, D.F.; Winker, K. (2006). "Forty-Ninth Supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-List of North American Birds". The Auk. 125 (3): 758–768. doi:10.1525/auk.2008.9708.
^ Olson, Storrs L. (1995). "Reviewed Work: History and Nomenclature of Avian Family-Group Names. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, Volume 222 by W. J. Bock" (PDF). The Auk. 112 (2): 539–546. JSTOR 4088759.

-Aa77zz (talk) 19:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] Bock, Walter J. (1994). History and Nomenclature of Avian Family-Group Names. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. Vol. Number 222. New York: American Museum of Natural History. pp. 148, 257. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help)

[2] Sclater, P.L.; Salvin, Osbert (1873). Nomenclator avium neotropicalium : sive avium quae in regione neotropica hucusque repertae sunt nomina systematice disposita adjecta sua cuique speciei patria accedunt generum et specierum novarum diagnoses (in Latin). London: Sumptibus Auctorum.

[3] Sclater, P.L. (1890). Catalogue of the Passeriformes or Perching Birds in the Collection of the British Museum. Tracheophonae. Catalogue of the Birds in the British Museum. Vol. 15. London: Trustees of the British Museum. p. 329.

[4] Garrod, Alfred Henry (1877). "Notes on the anatomy of passerine birds. Part II". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London: 447-452 [452].

[5] Ames, P.; Heimerdinger, M.; Warter, S. (1968). "The anatomy and systematic position of the antpipits Conopophaga and Corythopis". Postilla (114).

[6] Banks, R.C.; Chesser, R.T.; Cicero, C.; Dunn, J.L.; Kratter, A.W.; Lovette, I.J.; Rasmussen, P.C.; Remsen, J.V.; Rising, J.D.; Stotz, D.F.; Winker, K. (2006). "Forty-Ninth Supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-List of North American Birds". The Auk. 125 (3): 758–768. doi:10.1525/auk.2008.9708.

[7] Olson, Storrs L. (1995). "Reviewed Work: History and Nomenclature of Avian Family-Group Names. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, Volume 222 by W. J. Bock" (PDF). The Auk. 112 (2): 539–546. JSTOR 4088759.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]