Talk:Glory to Rome
Latest comment: 3 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Glory to Rome appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the board game Glory to Rome, despite being well-received, led to its publisher's bankruptcy in the mid-2010s and has been out of print since? Source: https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2018/09/how-a-ceo-fiddled-while-beloved-board-game-glory-to-rome-crashed-and-burned/ and others
Created by Piotrus (talk). Self-nominated at 06:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC).
New enough, long enough (just), overly cited. But this absolutely must be fixed:
"but in 2010s it has received became infamous"... I assume this is just a fat-finger edit but I'm not sure how to fix it. Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Maury Markowitz: The relevant phrase has now been fixed so this is probably ready for another look. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5, Just a minor note that it was copyedited to 'became famous'. Wouldn't infamous still be better? Speaking as a board game fan, the game is reasonably well known and respected, but infamous for being out of print and expensive due to the English publisher spectacular meltdown... Also ping User:Johnbod who fixed this earlier. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'm ok with either. Johnbod (talk) 16:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Narutolovehinata5, Just a minor note that it was copyedited to 'became famous'. Wouldn't infamous still be better? Speaking as a board game fan, the game is reasonably well known and respected, but infamous for being out of print and expensive due to the English publisher spectacular meltdown... Also ping User:Johnbod who fixed this earlier. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Maury Markowitz: The relevant phrase has now been fixed so this is probably ready for another look. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Good to go, any further cleanup can happen post-DYK I just wanted to be sure it was readable when it went up. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
