Talk:Glorious Revolution in Scotland
Glorious Revolution in Scotland has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 24, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Glorious Revolution in Scotland appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 March 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Glorious Revolution in Scotland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 12:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: SabreBD (talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 12:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking this on.--SabreBD (talk) 12:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other GAs)
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
- c. No original research: Done
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
b. Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (PD)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. Thanks, SabreBD, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles. I’m inspired a lot by your conscientiousness.
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 01:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Many thanks for a prompt review. Much appreciated.--SabreBD (talk) 07:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Inclusion of Glencoe
editI query the inclusion of a section relating to Glencoe; there is a separate page on that topic and it's not part of the Glorious Revolution. Can we just put a link to it?
The glorious revolution
editWhy its called the glorious revolution 129.0.79.126 (talk) 01:17, 2 February 2022 (UTC)