Talk:Global catastrophe scenarios

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Effective Altruism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to effective altruism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Effective AltruismWikipedia:WikiProject Effective AltruismTemplate:WikiProject Effective AltruismEffective Altruism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[History of medicine#Modern medicine|medical developments]] Anchor History of medicine#Modern medicine links to a specific web page: Modern medicine. The anchor (#Modern medicine) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Sustainability#Carrying capacity|carrying capacity]] Anchor Sustainability#Carrying capacity links to a specific web page: Carrying capacity. The anchor (#Carrying capacity) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Trinity (nuclear test)#Test predictions|first nuclear test]] The anchor (#Test predictions) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Inconsistency edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the "Non-anthropogenic" section, succeeding paragraphs give two very different estimates for the diameter of the Chixulub meteor: the 2d paragraph under "Asteroid impact" says 6 miles (10 km or so), but the 3d paragraph under "Planetary or interstellar collision" says 15 km (about 9 miles). Of course we can only approximate it's actual size but the article should be consistent. ManlyMatt (talk) 12:27, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic