Talk:Glenn Hegar
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COI
editI noticed that you reverted my removal of the templates on the Glenn Hegar page. However, you have made no attempt to explain why the templates are still needed. You also did not attempt to make any edits to the page to fix whatever you believe is still wrong with the article. You need to engage in a discussion on the talk page of the Glenn Hegar article instead of arbitrarily reverting the good faith edits of other editors. I look forward to your explanations on that talk page. You can review your unexplained edit here: Paris1127's unexplained edit to the Glenn Hegar article.Bing Norton 23:12, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- Many years ago, this page was edited by a user known as GlennHegar, and a username like that leads me to believe that Hegar himself/someone working for him made the unsourced edits. Since the edits have never been reverted, the COI tag is appropriate. I've also added a More Footnotes template to the page. Paris1127 (talk) 01:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I noticed that you reverted my removal of the templates on the Glenn Hegar page. However, you have made no attempt to explain why the templates are still needed. You also did not attempt to make any edits to the page to fix whatever you believe is still wrong with the article. You need to engage in a discussion on the talk page of the Glenn Hegar article instead of arbitrarily reverting the good faith edits of other editors. I look forward to your explanations on that talk page. You can review your unexplained edit here: Paris1127's unexplained edit to the Glenn Hegar article.Bing Norton 23:12, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Glenn Hegar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140109062336/http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe to http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140109062336/http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe to http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)