Talk:Glasgow North East (UK Parliament constituency)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Check me on this, guys.

edit

I'm an SNP supporter, but I wanted this to be as NPOV as possible. Would some interested party correct any mistakes I've made? I'm still adding citations. Ollie Garkey (talk) 17:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think most of what you added should go on the Glasgow North East by-election, 2009 article. This article is to cover the constituency in general and not any single election. It would probably be useful to have a brief 2 to 3 paragraph section summarising the election with a {{main}} link to the by-election article. Road Wizard (talk) 18:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

POV issues

edit

The section on the 2009 election reads like an essay, which is not referenced, not an encyclopaedic article. Phrases include "No less than", "There was concern that", "there was much talk that", "Frustrated by their loss". In addition there are also POV statement that Bain was an opposition candidate despite being Labour. Martin451 (talk) 21:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glasgow North East (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply