Talk:Glasgow Inner Ring Road
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glasgow Inner Ring Road article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from Glasgow Inner Ring Road appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editHey, can somebody look up for a map? Would make the descriptions clearer. Circeus 16:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
The Bridge to Nowhere is invisible
editWhere or what exactly is the Bridge to Nowhere in the image purportedly showing the Bridge to Nowhere. It is not clear at all. Moriori 20:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- As the caption in the article explains, an office block has been built on top of it. You can see underneath the office block a big concrete slab supported by pillars. I assume this is the bridge, and the ramp at the side has been replaced by the building. There's another bridge in the background but that goes somewhere and has cars on it. I agree it's not the clearest image. It would be great to have an older photo showing the bridge terminating in mid-air, if that's how it used to appear. 86.136.1.31 22:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- The bridge literally went nowhere, the part with the two storey office block on top is all there actually was, no stairs, no swirly ramps, no railings, nothing. Fraslet 22:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- OK. Tks to you both for your responses. The caption really needs to explain just what you guys have explained here, otherwise it will remain a visual riddle. Moriori 22:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- You have a fair point actually, I can see it immediately as I can remember what it looked like before the office block was built on top of it, it still looks a bit precarious. Fraslet 22:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- OK. Tks to you both for your responses. The caption really needs to explain just what you guys have explained here, otherwise it will remain a visual riddle. Moriori 22:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- The bridge literally went nowhere, the part with the two storey office block on top is all there actually was, no stairs, no swirly ramps, no railings, nothing. Fraslet 22:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
(un-indenting) If I understand Fraslet correctly, only the part directly over the road constituted the original bridge. I have updated the caption to say this. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 01:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
A related note
editTo editors... please don't wikilink "Bridge to Nowhere" for now, that page is just a disambiguation page. There is no article on the Bridge to Nowhere discussed in this article at this time. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 01:09, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
The ski jump
editIt would be nice if someone has a picture of the "ski jump" to include. The mention of it reminds me of the bus leaping over a gap in a half-completed expressway bridge in Speed. And I'm really curious to see it. Unfortunately I'm half the world away otherwise the first thing I'd ave done is to go right there and take a photo. :-(
Also, why do the new plans for the East Flank call for the new intersection to be just a distance away from the ski jump, leaving it untouched? Has it become some sort of infamous landmark? — Kimchi.sg | Talk 01:09, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Glasgow Inner Ring Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901193359/http://www.iht.org/motorway/m8glasedin.htm to http://www.iht.org/motorway/m8glasedin.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Glasgow Inner Ring Road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407094055/http://www.clydegateway.com/pages/about_east_end.php to http://www.clydegateway.com/pages/about_east_end.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)