Proposed merge with Ductless gland edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge Iztwoz (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

No sense having two separate articles; could easily be displayed (and would enhance the context and readability of) the parent articles, glands. LT910001 (talk) 06:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I agree, the content would better used to flesh out the Gland page. Lineslarge (talk) 10:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.