Talk:Gitche Manitou

Latest comment: 5 years ago by HilmarHansWerner in topic Manitou as mystical term

Untitled

edit

I wonder if anybody believes in this stuff anymore? (preceding unsigned soliloquy by 168.11.164.253 (talk · contribs) 14:18, 14 October 2005)

Probably. 128.6.176.39 21:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yes. The official Tribal government-sanctioned Religion of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe is Midewiwin and Gichi-manidoo is the primary Manidoo in that faith-system. CJLippert 02:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

"The name of the Province of Manitoba, or Manitou-abah, in Canada, is obviously related to this Algonquian or Ojibway word for Spirit, Creator, or even Great Spirit."

Can this be verified? There may be no reason to doubt it, except that I always hear alarm bells when a statement says "obviously". It usually seems to mean "this is what I think, please don't question it". And similarly, at first glance you'd think that the name for Romania was 'obviously' related to the Romans - but it's not. - 86.137.181.158 14:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

You make a good point, I think; even if it's correct, there's no real need for that "obviously"--"the name of the Canadian province Manitoba is etymologically related to the term manitou" would be fine. The Government of Manitoba's website says it probably comes from Cree or Ojibwe, and is connected to the word "manitou", so for now I think I'll cite that source in the article. Until I can find something better? --Miskwito 18:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Either way, I moved it to Manitou, where I think it's more relevant. --Miskwito 19:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oral traditions

edit

Ok so is Wikipedia eurocentric? Many aboriginal stories are orally tradition - that is passed down verbally from generation to generation from time immemorial. In some cases there may not be an official documented source for this information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.254.70.162 (talk) 21:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC)Reply


Christian Bias

edit

Why on earth does every section of this article except the last one tell us what Christians have done with these terms? How is that relevant to these topics at all? At most, shouldn't all that information be gathered into its own section as an appendix? Some of these sections have little more to say about their alleged topic than what the Christian reimagining is. 98.240.35.246 (talk) 13:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gitche Manitou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Manitou as mystical term

edit

Thank you for your explanations in the above-mentioned section! Very interesting. But where is the scientific basis for this? How does one arrive at the interpretation of Manitou as a kind of qi ('force') and in which literature can I find informations about this...? Thank you again! HilmarHansWerner (talk) 08:16, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply