Talk:Gisele Bündchen/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The9Man (talk · contribs) 20:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Notes

Here are few concerns so far.

• Personal life - In this section, the relationship with Leonardo DiCaprio is not closed properly.
• Links to 1 disambiguation page Sapucaia.
• giselebundchen.com leads to 403.

I am currently going through the inline citations. It may take a couple of days to complete. Thank you for your understanding.

- The9Man ^(Talk) 08:51, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing! Are you saying there is a ref issue in the Personal Life section for the relationship with Leonardo DiCaprio? ⌚️ (talk) 17:16, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Not concerned about the ref. From a reader's point of view, the section looks incomplete. It jumps from the first relationship to second without closing the former. I feel it should be mentioned why/when they got separated for complete information. Here is an example of what I mean - Naomi Campbell#Personal life
I am open to discussion.

- The9Man ^(Talk) 19:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Ah ok, I get that. I will add the reason they separated. It took her 14 years but she did say the reason they split was along the spiritual route. ⌚️ (talk) 21:39, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Good work. Much appreciated. - The9Man ^(Talk) 18:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations Trillfendi, the article has passed. - The9Man ^(Talk) 05:55, 10 April 2020 (UTC)