This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Latest comment: 1 hour ago8 comments4 people in discussion
I dislike the use of the term failure to describe the initial project from the pair as it comes off as biased and mean-spirited. I’ll work to rephrase this section. Sungexpression (talk) 07:36, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don't know anything about this group beyond what's on this page, honestly; I just don't think one can remove “failure” while keeping “success” and still claim to have a NPOV
Rebranded is fine; one could also just mention that there was an earlier project, or simply remove mention of it altogether. From what I'm gathering this group is not very noteworthy so I'd imagine some older project that didn't do well is probably even less notable than their current one (Walker Snarling) (talk) 16:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I reworded the first sentence. As for “After bairdsisters.com failed to gain traction,” I considered “...was unsuccessful in gaining traction” but that adds 5 syllables for really no good reason (Walker Snarling) (talk) 16:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
The source says "landed flat" which by my understanding is a synonym for failure. I also don't see framing it as building sucess out of failure as the source does to be mean spirited, that seems like the classic entrepreneurial story... They tried, failed, tried again, and succeeded. There is no shame in failing on your way to success. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Fundamentalist Christian or Christian nationalist?