Title edit

Should this be moved back to her pre-marital title Giovanna of Savoy. I can understand a certain amount of time should lapse before moving a consort, but I think five years is enough. Any ideas?Prsgoddess187 13:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

It was there. And o avoid Italian POV - after all, she is well-known as "Ioanna" in Bulgarian-originated view (compare the name of a certain hospital and whatever) - moved it ultimately to Joanna, which is neither, but the English variant. Suedois 15:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Giovanna of Bulgaria edit

I had to make a major change in the article:Queen Giovanna never converted to the Eastern Orthodox Church.King Boris III married Giovanna in a Roman Catholic ceremony in Assisi;Boris promised to raises any children as Roman Catholics.Instead,Boris had an Eastern Orthodox ceremony performed and the children were baptized in the Eastern Orthodox Church;this got Queen Giovanna and Archbishop Roncalli in trouble with Pope Pius XI.Eventually,the Pope realized King Boris was at fault not Queen Giovanna or Archbishop Roncalli who became Pope John XXIII.RFD 21:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

That branch of Saxe-Coburgs, the so-called Kohary, were roman catholics, before Bulgarian monarchy. Only because of Bulgarian national majority being Orthodox, they were (compelled?) to be the same. Their marriages were always with roman-catholics. One may just think that they never renounced roman-catholic basis. I would like to know more about Boris' decision: was it superficial only, or was he a devout orthodox?

Boris was converted as a child to the Orthodox faith, so he must have grown up as an Orthodox Christian.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 06:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Joanna? edit

Somehow I think that this women was never refer to by this name at all. You can't translate Giovanna and Ioanna and make it Joanna just because it's the straight English translation. Why not the quintessentially English Joan? Also the "of Place" part needs some discussion also. Should it be Italy, Savoy, or Bulgaria?--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 02:46, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giovanna of Italy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 19 February 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 13:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


Giovanna of ItalyGiovanna of Savoy – There were no Princes or Princesses “of Italy”, rather “of Savoy”, hence this is a misnomer. Because of that, the move is supported by WP:CONSISTENT. Estar8806 (talk) 03:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per nom.
2601:249:9301:D570:6C83:1998:1B48:29B4 (talk) 01:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply