As per WP:ELBURDEN, disputed links should be excluded by default until there is consensus for inclusion. @Sundayclose: please explain what unique value you feel the disputed link provides when there is already a picture of the subject's tomb in the article. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:50, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
- WP:RSP#Find A Grave: "Links to Find a Grave may sometimes be included in the external links section of articles, when the site offers valuable additional content, such as images not permitted for use on Wikipedia." The link provides additional images. Sundayclose (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Sundayclose, there are already images of both the subject and the tomb in the article. What specific unique value do you feel is offered by the link that justifies you edit-warring to include it without having achieved consensus for your position? Nikkimaria (talk) 17:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
- That's a good point for this particular article. I'll revert. The link is permitted but doesn't add enough after I reviewed again. Sundayclose (talk) 17:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
