| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Balance
editThe article would profit from expansion, and a more balanced content. Surely the published criticisms of her pieces are more nuanced than is indicated here, and that needs to be addressed, without blanking the page. 76.248.147.81 (talk) 04:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Re: expansion, I heartily agree. But if you look at the sources cited for the reaction to her Game of Thrones review, I think the article summarizes them and reflects their tone pretty well. (It was quite the tempest in a teapot.) That said, I'm sure that there have been more positive reactions to her criticism somewhere... I just haven't found them. --Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:41, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Is it possible she's just a poor journalist? Not everyone is capable of being objective and insightful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.111.69.37 (talk) 23:53, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- It is possible she is a poor journalist. Considering she worked for the Times and now the NY Times, it is not probable. 69.181.143.45 (talk) 22:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
The problem with the neutrality of this article is, as often the case, what is left in and what is left out: a two paragraph profile of a journalist and one paragraph devoted criticizing her for an ostensible "superficial treatment of gender issues?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhjrd (talk • contribs) 01:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC) However shallow or wrongheaded Bellefante may have been in the past, anyone who had read her Big City columns over the last year or so would find that she has become one of the Times' most intelligent and perceptive analysts of urban issues; her columns offer far more than the conventional wisdom. ˜˜˜˜
Re-upping this. This article has serious WP:BALANCE issues. Will work on adding more of content but this could be in need of trimming excessive details from the criticism. ModerateMike729 (talk) 17:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Ginia Bellafante. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130405113215/http://unbored.net/ginia-bellafante-critic/ to http://unbored.net/ginia-bellafante-critic/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110424053435/http://www.salon.com:80/media/1998/06/25media.html to http://www.salon.com/media/1998/06/25media.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110418195358/http://adweek.blogs.com:80/adfreak/2011/04/times-irks-geek-girls-with-thrones-review.html to http://adweek.blogs.com/adfreak/2011/04/times-irks-geek-girls-with-thrones-review.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110419024238/http://www.salon.com:80/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/16/game_of_thrones_review_of_reviewers to http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/16/game_of_thrones_review_of_reviewers/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)