This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
A fact from Gillingham bus disaster appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Im finding it hard to picture how this occurred, did the driver of the bus mow down the column of cadets in an enfilading manner? How could he possibly claim not to know what was happening, and who in their right mind would not mandate buses(any motor vehicle) to have their headlights on at night??? that's moronic even for 1950's Britain. Anon 00316:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
I suspect you'll find the lack of headlights was common in other countries too. Things we take for granted today weren't taken for granted fifty years ago - after all, we don't show lights when we walk and the majority of cyclists still don't show lights (even though it's now illegal not to), so why should we show them when we drive? That would have been the argument anyway. I don't think it's difficult to picture what happened - the column was only fifteen yards long and as the bus driver didn't see them (not that difficult to accept on a very dark night with no street lights and no headlights, I wouldn't have thought) it wouldn't have taken him long to mow down the entire column. -- Necrothesp16:42, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Using headlights in areas with streetlighting wasn't common until the 1970s; there was a theory that if the road was already lit, headlights didn't help you to see better but merely dazzled oncoming road users. And they were marching down the middle of the road at night with no high-vis jackets or lights, allegedly in fog - equally "moronic" by modern standards.86.27.171.145 (talk) 13:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely. When the current laws requiring lights to be shown after dark at all times were introduced in the mid-1970s there were actually demonstrations by London cabbies, who claimed that using headlights in well-lit London streets would be dangerous and drivers would be dazzled. The Transport and General Workers' Union, which represented commercial drivers (including bus drivers and cabbies), complained to the government about the new law. Now we would be shocked if a car wasn't showing lights (and the driver would soon be stopped by the police), but even less than forty years ago it was considered to be a weird idea. It's never a good idea to judge the past by modern standards, practices or beliefs. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've placed coordinates in the {{coord}} tag that puts the article on Dock Road, but hopefully a local can refine them to point to the actual site of the crash, apparently it's marked by a plaque on the dockside wall.86.27.171.145 (talk) 13:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC)Reply