Talk:Gillian Lucky

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Reads Like Resume edit

To me, this article reads almost exactly like a CV. I don't think minor edits will make much of a difference: there is nothing in the article that fits outside the bounds of a self-promoting resume other than the naming of her family members. Should a re-write be called for? I'd like the opinion of someone who is more familiar with this person's political prominence--how notable a figure is she? — Preceding unsigned comment added by YarLucebith (talkcontribs) 16:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Gillian Lucky/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I think this article goes beyond stub class - it has two refs and a decent general outline. Guettarda 15:17, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 15:17, 8 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 16:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gillian Lucky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply