This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
Gildas the Albanian is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
To tag Butler as unreliable is, I suggest, to miss the point. Of course he is unreliable re Gildas -also confused; as were Gale and others. "The difficulties created by discrepancies of time and place are not peculiar to the case of Gildas -they arise also in connection with Arthur and Merlin." While he is not reliable for any accurate account of Gildas, he is more than adequate to show the views with which subsequent scholars disagreed. Statements by Snell, Chambers, and for that matter Baring-Gould become a bit obscure if it isn't shown just what it was they were rebutting. Manannan67 (talk) 06:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
