Talk:Gigantophis
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Lythronaxargestes in topic N.b. concerning redescription
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gigantophis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Conflicting range
editArticle may need clearing, if fossils have been found in Colombia then range extends beyond current day sahara. Vercynogetorix (talk) 10:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- No, the fossils from Colombia belongs to Titanoboa, not Gigantophis, as is already stated in the text. However, the article certainly needs more information... --Rextron (talk) 22:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Vercynogetorix: Gigantophis and Titanoboa are not the same genus, so there is no conflict.--Kevmin § 03:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
N.b. concerning redescription
editPlease do not add images from Rio and Mannion (2017)'s redescription of Gigantophis. While the images are CC, they are non-commerical, which means we cannot use them. Lythronaxargestes (talk) 19:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)