This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Texas, Austin/History of Pentecostalism in the Americas (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have revised the article significantly since the rejection. If anyone has any ideas for improvement, please send them my way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akibah (talk • contribs) 01:33, 23 April 2015
@Akibah: I see this as a substantially enhanced version over the version I pushed back as a WP:AFC reviewer. Well done. May I commend {{cite web}}, {{Cite journal}}, {{Cite news}}, {{Cite book}} and others in that family to you? I know you have worked long and hard on the referencing. The reason I mention them is not that they are mandatory. I mention them because I think they will give you a better overall result. Their use is optional. My recommendation enhances the formatting of both the references and includes the notes. Not doing this will not impede a reviewer in their acceptance of the draft. Doing this will simply improve the look and feel of the eventual article. FiddleFaddle09:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Timtrent: Akibah: I have corrected all of the 21 references using the Cite Templates instead of the ref commands. Does anyone have any other suggestions for me? Thanks for the help!
