Talk:Gibraltar at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vibhijain (talk · contribs) 16:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

A good article, and should be a GA with some tweaking

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  • MoS suggests not to have bold wikilinks.
Done
  • competed at the >> competed in the
What's wrong with this? It's grammatically correct.
  • "which is responsible for the Commonwealth Games and Commonwealth Youth Games in Gibraltar." - This can be rather moved to the background section.
It's already there. Lead is supposed to be a summary of whole article.
  • "The Association selected ... different sports." Needs copy-editing. I would prefer "The Association selected a delegation of five male competitors, who participated in eleven events of three different sports."
Done
  • "semifinal of 200 m" - 200 m what???
Done
  • where he >> in which he
Done
  • athletics competitor - competitors should be plural
Done
  • Tell that Frank Warwick is a cyclist
Done
  • It seems that Sanderson participated in five events, and not six
Done
  • Link British Columbia
Done
  • 23.25 seconds, 23.25 minutes, 23.25 hours, or 23.25 days? :P
Done
That will be overlinking as there are already corresponding "See also" in each section.
  • The pictograms in the section headings should come first before the sport name
Done
  • Add the key for Q
Done
  • Link the athletes at least once.
Athletes are non-notable as per Wikipedia standards of notability. No point of linking their names with a red-link.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  • "The country has ... since then." is unsourced
Done
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Good luck!!! ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 16:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Vibhi. — Bill william comptonTalk 17:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Article passed. Congrats! :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:09, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply