Talk:Giant penguin hoax

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Status discredited edit

It's not said how and why. (although it'd be easy to conjecture.)--Marhawkman 17:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

- How and why? Do you mean How Mr. Signorini did the tracks and Why he did the prank? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.168.44.37 (talk) 05:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deletion possibility? edit

I'm considering putting this page under deletion. The scientific material is under Palaeeudyptinae and hence is redundant here, and there is little actual vefiable content on this page. Please add comments as to why this should be saved, or put references in the article. Olin 22:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'd suggest trying to round up references and move what's move-worthy to a section under Palaeeudyptinae, then exchanging this page with a redirect. Dysmorodrepanis 09:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Alternatively, why not re-edit this to be a Category:Hoax article, cross-red'd to the Palaee-whatever, since the hoax itself clearly got "notable" cover in the contemtporay press ? The literary refs could be left, as they provide plausible seed-corn from which the hoax was grown. -- SockpuppetSamuelson 11:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
The Crypto-crew should decide this. It's their critter, after all. :) Dysmorodrepanis 16:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Articles don't "belong" to any one group, really... But it's really poor quality article, and there are "real" gp's .Olin 17:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Flying Penguins edit

A reference to the BBC's flying penguin video of early 2008 or thereabouts might be added? 82.163.24.100 (talk) 14:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Um... edit

Why does this have the category of "Legendary birds"?

-Some random Anon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.125.247 (talk) 19:08, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giant penguin hoax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply