Talk:Giambattista della Porta

Latest comment: 8 months ago by 2600:8805:C40B:1C00:B04E:6CEF:CBDA:84CE in topic Reason for even being here ?

Not Vandals edit

We are not vandals. We are editing this page for a school project. Some of the odd things that was on this site were merely placeholders that we never meant to leave there. We are NOT VANDALS. And we intend to get rid of the placeholders and fill them in with serious responses within the hour. That is, we would if you would let us. Thank you.

-HardingBenson

This note should have been signed by the editor with 4 ~ in a row, which would have automatically included the data and time of the edit, and the name or IP address of the editor. As it stands, the note is addressed to someone, who should have been identified. ww 07:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Citation Needed edit

Charles J. Mendelsohn commented:

He was, in my opinion, the outstanding cryptographer of the Renaissance. Some unknown who worked in a hidden room behind closed doors may possibly have surpassed him in general grasp of the subject, but among those whose work can be studied he towers like a giant.

Could some one provide a citation for this quote ? its been deleted twice. I'll repost if its cited J8079s (talk) 03:50, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cipher edit

Porta's Cipher is definitely one of my favorite coding techniques. the fact that it requires that MASSIVE 26x26 matrix is a bit of a bummer though. Porta was really the best cryptographer of the renaissance.n — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.185.88.30 (talk) 04:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giambattista della Porta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giambattista della Porta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reason for even being here ? edit

whoever made this page , I thank you , this is helping me better understand who I am and who I decend from . But I know why I am here why is everyone else here ? 2600:8805:C40B:1C00:B04E:6CEF:CBDA:84CE (talk) 16:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply