Talk:Giacomo (disambiguation)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Maddy from Celeste in topic Requested move 10 April 2023
 | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
 | On 10 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Giacomo to Giacomo (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 10 April 2023 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 15:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
– The name is the primary topic. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Both items visible at https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Giacomo are about human names, and with the ratio of 864 total and <10 for the handful of non-anthroponymy items listed, this is probably correct. It's probably a bit hard to argue that the long-term significance of a race horse and a building really compares to Puccini and others. --Joy (talk) 19:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Weak oppose though the name may have more long-term significance it has nearly as many views (700) as the name (783)[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- The list of people is split off because of the WP:NAMELIST convention, but each of those entries is still a "Giacomo". So if you look at those views in turn at [2] the picture is quite different. --Joy (talk) 19:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support. The name has a substantial lead in long-term significance. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.