Talk:Gerta Keller

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 128.91.40.237 in topic Keller's two marriages

Notability edit

I am here to make updates to this wiki that need to be made to reflect the truth. Gerta Keller is a Princeton Prof. who recieved emeritus status - she is highly notable so i dont know what you are thinking by suggesting otherwise. Not only is she notable but she is recognized as an expert in her field of work and her awards/honors/fellowship list is endless and posted on princeston.edu the only noob getting erased will be the ones on here who try to erase the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRightofHerWay (talkcontribs) 20:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

a full list of awards still needs to be added.
Specific examples of her work still need to be added. TheRightofHerWay (talk) 23:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I restored this article because I'm quite certain that this person is notable enough for an article. Please give me and others a little time to work this out, thanks! --JoanneB 20:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

thank you TheRightofHerWay (talk) 20:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

You should remove this. It's just another vanity page for a non-notable scientitian. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.34.234.247 (talkcontribs)

You have to love when a true expert can discern that this "scientitian" is not notable. Alansohn (talk) 22:57, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

remove this noobs page. gerta is just another wannabe getting in the way of big science. lets flush this turd down the toilet back into the obscurity she deserves —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.77.51.31 (talk) 02:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

That your one and only contribution (unsigned IP!) bothers with Gerta Keller proves that she is notable enough. It is true there is a Science review of the Alvarez hypothesis: Schulte, Peter (5 March 2010). "The Chicxulub Asteroid Impact and Mass Extinction at the Cretaceous- Paleogene Boundary". Science. 327 (5970): 1214–1218. doi:10.1126/science.1177265. Retrieved 2010-03-08. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)). But the review did not tell anything new and the coupling of sulfur dioxide emissions, flood basalts and extinction events seems quite clear too, the whole story is not uncovered yet:

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gerta Keller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Collaborate on the updates - I am not going anywhere edit

Hello,

There are updates that need to be made. If you would like to delete my updates, i will delete yours. We can either work together or be silly but my updates were taken right off the Princeton page. If you would like to re-word how I worded my previous update .. lets talk. Otherwise i will simply re-do it because it is an accurate update.

what was the issue with the update i provided? TheRightofHerWay (talk) 20:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women Scientist Project edit

Gerta Keller is a perfect example of beating all odds as a woman to get to the top of her career.

1. She grew up on a struggling dairy farm and, as a girl, was not predestined for an intellectual path. Still, with only vocational training, she managed to get into college in San Francisco and went on to get a doctorate in geology and paleontology from Stanford. Along the way, she was faced with gender related adversity - which she fought against. Things, for example, such as organizing her fellow students when a teacher refused to let the girls come to school in pants.

2. Not only has she stood up against sexist remarks, for her entire career as a Princeton professor, she has been a leading critic of the established theory of dinosaur extinction. Which her at odds with the scientific establishment, she has been shouted down at conferences, subjected to bitter, aggressive, and unfair attacks, *as you can see in the talk page, but that is nothing compared to other attacks*

Time and time again, there have been science theories that, once accepted as mainstream, despite having holes, are defended at all cost. Anyone, including other scientists, who dares to challenge the status quo is denounced, ridiculed, and attacked. This type of behavior is to the detriment of science, as we have found that, in many cases, the mainstream theory has holes because it is, in fact, proven incorrect. In the end, whether that is the case here, is impossible to predict, but it is beside the point because her work has contributed to the field in either case. Most importantly, Gerta Keller is one of the few willing to be brave enough to challenge and question the obvious flaws in a mainstream theory, which forces and motivates science to continue to work to fill the knowledge gaps of that theory to either explain it, or eventually, as a science community to reject it and find alternative explanations. Keller has been a martyr in this process, taking the abuses for years, in the name of science.

She is a perfect example of a Woman in Science. Young girls deserve to learn about her, as a role model, and someone they can aspire to become.

I added her to the women's scientist project for these reasons. Her Wikipedia could be filled with much more content, including her awards, specific contributions (aside from just the controversy), and collaborations she has done with other scientists. TheRightofHerWay (talk) 23:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

id like to add the pic featured in this article - anyone know if i can or is it protected?
Here Are The Couples Of Science Rivals You May Not Know - MobyGeek.com
[1]https://mobygeek.com/ict-news/couples-of-science-rivals-2441 TheRightofHerWay (talk) 00:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Keller's two marriages edit

Her first marriage was to one Tim Callahan, it lasted circa 1967-1971. (He apparently was the boyfriend in the car when she was shot almost to death.) See [2].

Her second marriage was to Andrew Majda, a very famous mathematician. They married in the 70s, and it lasted until his death in 2021. See [3] and [4] 128.91.40.237 (talk) 16:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply