Talk:German battleship Bismarck/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

1. There are four disamb links according to the checker Arcona,Brest,Halifax,Scuttle
2. The displacement in the text and inf box do not match 50,300 t (49,500 long tons) to 50,900 t (50,100 LT; 56,100 ST)
3. References for book printed locations we have Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press - Annapolis: Naval Institute Press - Annapolis: United States Naval Institute Press

Good work just the three minor points. Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Jim, they should all be fixed now. Parsecboy (talk) 11:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)